News Releases

Mark Privratsky on the Inventor Assistance Program

07.11.12

Mark Privratsky was a guest blogger this week for the Center for Pro Bono's blog, the Exchange. In his post, Mark details how the program came to fruition, how it's serving as an example for additional regional programs, and the success that the LegalCORPS Inventor Assistance Program has experienced during its first year. Mark indicates that within a few short years, we should see complete regional coverage by similar programs across the country. To date, more than 50 lawyers have signed on with the Inventor Assistance Program and almost 20 clients have received pro bono assistance.

Celebrating the One-Year Anniversary of the Pro Bono Patent Prosecution Program
Posted on June 26, 2012 by centerforprobono

This week’s guest blogger, Mark Privratsky, Partner at Lindquist & Vennum, LLP, shares the progress made since we last highlighted the Minnesota LegalCORPS Inventor Assistance Program a year ago.

Many accomplishments have been logged toward the Minnesota pilot of the LegalCORPS Inventor Assistance Program (“IAP”) shedding its “pilot” moniker and showing it is here to stay.  The hard work of the three founding Minneapolis law firms of Lindquist & Vennum, Meyer & Njus, and Patterson Thuente Christensen Pedersen, over the past year has truly come to fruition.

Composed of IP counsel from Minnesota businesses and private law firms, the IAP’s Process Committee began the journey by developing the program’s day-to-day procedures.  The other side of the coin brought together the IAP Funding Committee, which successfully obtained monies and future commitments to ensure support for at least three years.  The Screening Committee began its work early on too, reviewing published patent applications to determine if they qualified for services.  Finally, the nonprofit LegalCORPS has been matching volunteer lawyers with clients, a full-time task in itself.

Nationally, the America Invents Act Pro Bono Task Force exists to lead the way for development of similar programs across the country.  The Task Force includes at its core: David Kappos, Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office; the Honorable Randall R. Rader, Chief Judge, Federal Circuit Court of Appeals; Jim Brookshire, Executive Director of the Federal Circuit Bar Association; Warren Tuttle, United Inventors Association; individuals that founded the Minnesota pilot, and numerous other representatives from the ABA, AIPLA, IPO, and entities with government and private backgrounds.  Three more programs are slated to come online this year, and eleven in 2013, with complete regional coverage possibly by 2014.  And under instruction from the Task Force, attorneys Amy Salmela and Mark Privratsky are authoring an IAP “best practices” handbook.

The true success of the IAP is the good it does.  Inventor Nick Musachio’s application for a resistance device was saved from abandonment, recently resulting in an issued patent.  Similarly, the first inventor to enter the program, Paul Ashman, received a Notice of Allowance on his application, after two rounds of Office Actions and multiple examiner interviews.  Without the assistance of his volunteer attorney, Ashman may have given up.  Over fifty Minnesota lawyers have signed on to provide these same great services, and almost twenty clients have already received assistance to date.  It has been a good year!

Contact
LaFromboise, Antoine J.
Communications and Brand Manager
T 612.371.3269

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.